On 6/8/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That layout works for me. It's very close to what I already have in the
image I'm preparing to check in.
Question: should we have contrib and sandbox folders in there at the
same level as trunk/tags/branches? I'd personally prefer to keep those
things separate from the main code.
I'd say that's a bridge we can cross when we come to it. Personally,
I agree that sandbox (in the sense of a place to hack around on new
related code, not a place to make a copy of existing code for
experimental changes, that would just be a regular old experimental
branch) should be separate, but I don't have a strong opinion on
contrib. Regardless, since we currently lack both contrib code and
work that needs to be done in a sandbox, it seems like a fine decision
to put off.
Also, I've just been working on some simple static HTML pages for the
project website (I've yet to actually see any time and energy savings
from XML-to-(X)HTML processes. Of course, I can always do the
xdoc/maven thing if y'all prefer that instead.
Static HTML is fine IMO, personally, I don't like maven generated
sites, they all look the same, and generally feel kind of clunky to
me. The anakia based sites that a number of ASF projects use (the
incubator, apr, probably others, but those are the ones I know of off
the top of my head) are nice enough, but personally I like static
HTML. A nice stylesheet can give you plenty of consistency across
pages, and it's easier for people to dive in and make changes to
regular old HTML anyway.
-garrett
