Sorry for being such a noob & not knowing how to get the individual e-mails from the archive to respond in thread properly...
First a question: are the other mailing lists live, or just placeholders? On the Maven vs. Static website discussion, I think the discussion was setting up a false dichotomy. Reports such as Javadoc, Source Xref (cross reference), etc. are obviously not static content. They've got to be generated with something. As long as we assume the Maven build will be maintained for the Java implementation, then you may as well use Maven to generate these (and sure, duplicate as many as are feasible in an Ant build if you so desire...). The only thing I think would be up for debate is whether to ALSO use Maven to do it's automated compilation of tying the whole site together, or to do that with statically maintained HTML. I would think you'd still want to then refer to Maven generated content from the static HTML where possible... Back to the debate part: I, personally, would find that using Maven to generate at least the subsite section that represents the Java implemention would be helpful. Some work to get the desired & consistent look & navigation as the main site, but probably doable. I guess since we're talking about the potential of other language implementations, doing the main site statically would make it easier for contributors not using Java to contribute to... -- Stephen Duncan Jr www.stephenduncanjr.com
