On 6/20/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd say the goals for M1 are pretty simple...
produce a stable, reasonably functional impl for folks to start working with. Where "reasonbly functional" means it implements the RFC4287 with no obvious gaps.
That makes sense to me, although one question to think about here is how stable the parser/object model API will be at this point.
Complete Atom Publishing support would not be a goal for M1.
Agreed, that seems reasonable to hold off for subsequent milestones.
Having Java5 and JDK142 support would be a goal.
I'm less concerned with this personally, but if someone wants to pick up the work, that's fine with me.
Decent docs and samples would be a goal.
Agreed.
As would self-contained test case (no reliance on externally hosted resources).
Agreed. Also, can we find something other than "M1" to call this? I'm not a huge fan of the practice of using a series of "milestone" releases leading up to 1.0, it implies that there aren't any milestone releases after 1.0. How about just calling this a 0.1.0 release? -garrett
