Yeah, I realized what you'd meant after I stepped out for a bit. :-)
Stephen Duncan wrote: > Well, not literally, I suppose. But I mean that there are several > methods with the same name, one that takes in only the content, and > the rest that take content & a MIME type. I prefer the "extra" > parameter to come after the common one. That's what I meant. > > -Stephen > > On 6/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> For the methods that accept MimeType, it is not optional. That is, if >> @type is not "text", "html" or "xhtml", a mime type MUST be specified. >> >> - James >> >> Stephen Duncan wrote: >> > Seems like the MimeType should be the second parameter, not the first. >> > At least, that's my preferred style; optional parameters are tacked >> > on after, required ones... >> > >> > - Stephen >> > >> > >
