Well, the stax ref impl has it's own problems, namely, it doesn't seem to properly support the config properties that tell it to ignore DTD's and entity replacements. I'm going to be trying out the new Woodstox 3.0 parser this next week to see if it does what we need.
- James Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 8/19/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I may be missing something, but these are likely caused by using the >> woodstox stax impl vs. the stax reference impl. Specifically, woodstox >> does not entity encode greater than signs; the stax reference impl does. >> Remove the woodstox parser from the classpath and things should work. > > Well, if that's the case (don't have time to test right now), should > we stop using woodstox by default? Both of our build systems pull it > in, so anyone who tries to build things from source will get these > failures. > > -garrett >
