Yes it builds cleanly now.
Thanks,
-steve
On 9/20/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, fixed. The eclipse compiler didn't catch this but the ant builder
did. The problem is caused by a limitation some compilers have with
resolving java5 generics in some instances. Pull from head and give it
another try.
- James
Steven Isaacson wrote:
> I cannot currently build the abdera trunk. I am seeing the following
error
> when building using ant:
>
> **compile.parser:
> [mkdir] Created dir:
/home/spi/prog/abdera/java/trunk/build/work/parser
> [javac] Compiling 41 source files to
> /home/spi/prog/abdera/java/trunk/build/ work/parser
> [javac]
> /home/spi/prog/abdera/java/trunk/parser/src/main/java/org/apache/abd
> era/parser/stax/FOMEntry.java:142: unexpected type
> [javac] found : org.apache.abdera.model.Base
> [javac] required: reference
> [javac] if (category.getParentElement() instanceof Categories) {
> [javac] ^
> [javac]
> /home/spi/prog/abdera/java/trunk/parser/src/main/java/org/apache/abd
> era/parser/stax/FOMSource.java:138: unexpected type
> [javac] found : org.apache.abdera.model.Base
> [javac] required: reference
> [javac] if (category.getParentElement() instanceof Categories) {
> [javac] ^
> [javac] Note:
> /home/spi/prog/abdera/java/trunk/parser/src/main/java/org/apac
> he/abdera/parser/stax/util/FOMList.java uses unchecked or unsafe
> operations.
>
> [javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
> [javac] 2 errors
>
> I am seeing the same error using Sun's jvm and IBM's jvm:
> [00:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/prog/abdera/java/trunk> java -version
> java version " 1.5.0_08"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_08-b03)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_08-b03, mixed mode, sharing)
>
> C:\workspace\driver3\abdera0.2>java -version
> java version "1.5.0"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
pwi32dev-20060511
> (SR2))
>
> IBM J9 VM (build 2.3, J2RE 1.5.0 IBM J9 2.3 Windows XP x86-32
> j9vmwi3223-2006050
> 4 (JIT enabled)
>
> I made sure to do a svn co to get the latest revision.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> -steve
>
