Works for me. +1 - James
Ugo Cei wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:27 PM, James M Snell wrote: > >> The reason we haven't included to this point is that we don't compile >> against it. It is required only at runtime and then only indirectly via >> the standard Java security stuff. > > Anyway, it's not nice to have tests failing unless you manually download > stuff. You can't do automated continuous integration, at the very least. > > I propose that we add the dependency to the Maven POM and fix the Ant > build to go and download the jar prior to running tests. > > That is, if we want to keep both build systems, which seems quite > redundant to me. > > WDYT? > > Ugo > >
