On 10/27/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current Abdera configuration model is designed around the notion of
being able to configure alternative default implementations in a way
that is transparent to consuming applications.  However, since we only
have one implementation of the interfaces as it's just as easy just to
do Parser parser = new MyOtherParser(), I'm strongly leaning towards
backing this stuff out and simplifying the configuration model.  Using
alternative Parser implementations would no longer require a
configuration step.  Implementations would just new up the alternative
Parser.

If we went this way would there still be the concept of a default
parser back end, or would we be having people hardcode
org.apache.abdera.parser.stax.* into their code since that's our only
current implementation?

-garrett

Reply via email to