There are two reasons:
1. I wanted to follow the Rails conventions
2. A Route is definitely different than a URI Template and I want to
make sure it's clear which is being used.
- James
Dan Diephouse wrote:
Brian Moseley wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 2:22 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.addRoute("service", "/:base", TargetType.TYPE_SERVICE)
.addRoute("feed", "/:base/:collection", TargetType.TYPE_COLLECTION)
out of curiosity, why the ":foo" syntax? why not "{foo}" as in url
templates? or are those not acting as templates?
Simply following rails conventions. The semantics are different too I
believe. James can probably give a better answer though - I don't really
care either way.
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
MuleSource
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog