Definitely sounds like 405 is more appropriate to me! Dan On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Chris Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 405 METHOD NOT ALLOWED definitely makes more sense. > 405 implies that the method is recognized but not supported. > Cheers, > -- Chris > On Jun 6, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Jim Ancona wrote: > > Most of the unimplemented cases in AbstractProvider and >> AbstractCollectionAdapter call ProviderHelper.notsupported(), which returns >> an HTTP status of 415 - Media type not supported. So an HTTP PUT or DELETE >> on a collection URI, or a POST to an Entry URI returns 415. It seems to me >> that something like 405 Method not allowed would be clearer. >> >> Thoughts? If there's consensus on this, I'll log a bug and submit a patch. >> >> Jim >> > > S'all good --- chriswberry at gmail dot com > > > > -- Dan Diephouse http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
