No objection from me either.
Jim
David Calavera wrote:
Soooo, I forgot it, no objections to the graduation
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:32 AM, David Calavera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Hi Chris, I think Dan and the Mule guys have been using the version 0.4 for
some time, but if you want to migrate to 0.4 now I recommend you to wait
some weeks and the version 0.5 should be done.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Chris Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Thanks.
I was under the impression that graduation == 1.0.
Cheers,
-- Chris
On Oct 27, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Chris Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Only one question. Has anyone run Abdera 0.4.X through a serious
load/stability test?
I ask this because we are still on 0.3.0 which had some very large
memory
leaks that we've patched (and sent info about to Abdera).
And we have not yet upgraded to 0.4.X because we were waiting for it to
stabilize and most bugs to get expunged.
But mostly because upgrading will not be trivial as the API changed a
great
deal between 0.3 and 0.4.
Given this history, it might be prudent that Abdera get that sort of
test
prior to 1.0 ?
We would do it, but as I said, are still at 0.3.0. (And one should use
a
relatively real world app to load test with)
All that said, we are very eager to see the graduation, which should
indicate that the API is relatively fixed.
Let me reiterate: Graduation has NOTHING to do with technical
readiness for any given release. It is simply moving the project from
the incubator to its own top level ASF project. There is no
indication that any API is finalized when we graduate, there is no
need to do a special release, etc.
That isn't to say that all of the things you're mentioning shouldn't
be done, of course they should be. It's just to say that graduation
is about the state of the project's community, and is largely
orthogonal to the state of the actual code.
-garrett
S'all good --- chriswberry at gmail dot com
--
David Calavera
http://www.thinkincode.net
