-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/30/2012 09:02 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
> SAML 2.0 is the latest and best version of SAML. Is there/should
> there be a restriction in the SAML document about using just SAML
> 2.0 and higher? If a new version of SAML is produced, does there
> need to be a different set of messages defined or should the
> current set of messages be sufficient (assuming that the entire
> protocol world is not radically overhauled).
>
> Does any of this need to be put into the document?
I think (as individual) that calling out SAML 2 is fine. There will
probably be a 2.1 in our lifetime but whatever 3.0 looks like it is
unlikely that it is automatically applicable to ABFAB.
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk/wYLIACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZndCiwCgxqWSjVAe40w34CPuvJeriWv1
I98AnRYsrce88WR9tfiaHbGVTWnu56jf
=yKqx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
