Re: why bother planning? (was Re: Bugzilla comments)

[Jesper Skov]

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Paul> Huh?  Your description of the situation is quite apt, but that's
Paul> entirely the wrong conclusion to draw.  It's *always* useful to
Paul> know that feature X has a minimum of 40 hours of effort
Paul> remaining before it Just Works.

Agree 100%. But I also know how reliable estimates are, especially if
they're just shaken out of a sleeve.

But I don't really mind having the option. I just think it unlikely
that it'll be put to proper use.

Jesper