> Eric: > 2. Right now you have no users at all, at least none that > are Normal People. (If you are reading this note, there > is virtually no chance at all that you are normal.) > Unhappy users are better than no users. This might be true if we had a monopoly on the market, but we are not offering a software that is one of a kind, but a word processor, one among many. In that context unhappy user is quite likely to become not only no user at all, but also a never-again-user. Sure, we cannot and will not please everyone, but we need to consider very carrefully what type of user we will not please, or it will backfire on us. Tomas
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Ron Ross
- constraints and table models (was Re: Topic... Paul Rohr
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Martin Sevior
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Tomas Frydrych
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 rms
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Jesper Skov
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Eric W. Sink
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 WJCarpenter
- Re: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Sam TH
- RE: Topic: Tables and 1.0 Tom Newton
