On Thu, 3 May 2001, Hubert Figuiere wrote:

> Actually Dom have added sniffer use to xap_App. Hence the include.
> Dom asked yesterday wether this should go to ap_App or xap_App, and
> we concluded that this belonged to xap_App is import/export is quite
> generic.

Speaking of ap vs. xap, the ignored words code lives in
af/xap/xp/xad_Document.  Is there any rational reason that this doesn't
live in the piece table document code instead?

pat



Reply via email to