On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 14:12, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > At 6:58 PM +0000 2/26/02, Andrew Dunbar wrote:
> >Also I'm wondering if this decision should be taken > >seperately from deciding whether we should use Pango > >at some point. > > Pango, as cool as it is, requires a LOT of Glib/GNOME to > function and that's problematic on our full platform list. > Actually, Pango just requires GLib, which should work on all of our supported platforms. It definitiely works on Win32, *nix, and is being ported to BeOS. (www.gtk.org/beos) And, I remember Havoc Pennington (a GTK+ maintainer) saying that he would like it to be as portable as AbiWord. Plus, glib is used in wv, so it must be at least as portable as we are. -- sam th OpenPGP Key: CABD33FC "Oh yeah? Well your mom has some pretty fancy tail-call optimization herself, you numbskull!"
