I would add my vote to the concept of being more concerned about stability & 
documentation of the current feature set at this point instead of considering adding 
more features at this point.  There was an initial feature set for Abi-word I'm 
sure...  I would complete that set per the current plan & continue with the bug 
prioritization & triage.  A robust application that DOES what it claims to do & 
doesn't crash or lose work is your most important feature at this point.  Most of the 
things that have been discussed on this list lately (tables, letterheads, etc.)  are 
covered in some rudimintary fashion.  Those features or extentions of features not in 
Abiword should be added to the bug list as ENHANCEMENTS &, I suppose, if everyone 
votes for one of these enhancements as important for version 1.0 then it could be 
added.  Otherwise, the roadmap for after version 1.0 would be laid out by the bug list.

For instance, the recent discussion of letterhead.  I do not currently use this 
feature, but it appears that Wordperfect handles this as a kind of header.  To allow 
letterheads, the following feature EXTENTION should be considered: a) Images in 
headers, b) Multiple headers & footers per document, c) Allow headers & footers to be 
assigned to individual document pages with up to 2 per page.  This set of extentions 
to the header/footer feature would not only allow for the classic business letterhead 
format (full business name & address on 1st page with abreviated name on continuation 
pages) but would handle a multitude of situations (facing pages on front and back 
printed documents, chapter heading and numbering in books, etc.)

For what it is worth.

Regards,
J. Raines

*********** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***********

On 5/3/01 at 6:31 AM projectd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

For what it's worth, I'll chime in with my opinion on the series of threads currently 
running on the developer's list.

I like the current numbering scheme, building towards a 1.0 release. It doesn't 
particularly matter to me whether the next versions are 0.7.15, 0.7.16, etc, or 0.8.0, 
0.8.1, etc.  Seems like THAT decision has already been made and to change now would 
add confusion.

What should be in version 1.0?  The current feature set of course.  I'd really like to 
see tables, even if it's rudimentary.  (Of course, ME
saying that is probably akin to one of the Pharohs saying, "and I'd like to put a 
pyramid right over...there."  Easy for ME to say; I'm not doing the work).  A tables 
implementation doesn't have to have all the bells and whistles of a Word tables 
feature, just the ability to group some text together and box it in with lines and not 
crash the app.

Speaking solely for myself though, if tables will take a year to do, I'd release 1.0 
without tables.  It's a close call, but I think stability and buglessness is more 
important for 1.0 than a particular feature at this point.  Abiword is NOT a toy; it's 
already got some features that take it out of the realm of, say, WordPad and minor 
apps like that.  In general, if I download an app that's useful, but limited, I'll 
have a better impression than if I download something that's got a gazillion features 
but crashes or behaves inconsistently.

Key to my impression is getting the sense of on-going development.  That is, if a 
feature I really want is missing from a stable app, I want some assurance that the app 
is still undergoing development.  If/when you release 1.0, you need to make the point 
that evelopment doesn't stop here; it's just a beginning.  That way, I'm more likely 
to stick around and wait on an app I like to get the features I need.  If I download 
something that's incomplete AND unstable, I'm more likely to simply abandon it and go 
looking for something else.  There's no way 1.0 will be seen as complete by EVERYONE.  
In fact, it's more likey to be seen as incomplete (where's feature X? and Y?) than any 
of the 0.X.X releases simply because it IS 1.0.

Given that 1.0 will be seen as missing some key feature by SOMEONE, your best bet is 
to be as bugfree as possible, even at the cost of some features.  That way your 
reviews will read, "rock solid word processor,  can hardly wait until the next release 
when we'll probably see feature X" instead of "still some bugs to be worked out and 
it's missing my favorite feature X."

Cheers,
Drew
*********** END FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***********


-----------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
unsubscribe in the message body.

Reply via email to