Quoting "John H. Raines, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > If your priorities don't match ours, then your stuff doesn't get done in > the > timeframe that you'd like it done in. End of discussion. > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > So what exactly has been the point of requesting votes for the most > important bugs? I thought it was to give the developers feedback so > they could direct their energies to the things that would be most > productive in terms of user requirements.
It's very important that you cast your votes for bugs, and continue to file RFEs. They do give developers a sense of what users feel is important, and what the product currently lacks. Tables, however, are something that we've personally heard enough about. You can continue casting votes for table-related bugs in bugzilla, but just know that we have a timeframe for doing tables, and that is post 1.0. We recieve *many* nasty and whiney emails about how we don't support tables, and it just grows tiresome to hear the same story time and time again. Our plans for future table support don't seem to correspond to many user's requests, and this is unfortunate, but unlikely to change without monetary contributions or other such incentives. We have the majority of our goal list set right now for our 1.0 release, and while your input/vote is invaluable, our opinion on tables is not going to change until 1.0 is out the door. Your votes overall are important and will help sway developer energies. However, since this is a 100% volunteer project, people tend to do what they want to or find interesting, and not what other people (developer or user) want them to do. Since we are volunteers, our time is limited. This is not a democracy. Think of it more like a newspaper opinion poll. Sorry, Dom ----------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
