Hi all!

My code is causing a violation against the MaxLocksPerFile in the 
registry.
I checked Microsoft Knowledge Base 
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;815281.
It suggests increasing MaxLocksPerFile setting in registry by using :

DAO.DBEngine.SetOption dbmaxlocksperfile, 1500

or manually.

So far I discovered already that the problem is caused by the 
following code:

dim dbs as database
dim rst as recordset
set dbs = currentdb
set rst = dbs.openrecordset ("A NORMAL SELECT-QUERY")

do until rst.EOF
rst.edit
.....
rst.UPDATE
rst.MoveNext
loop

rst.close
dbs.close

I don't mind to use SetOption method.
However, I don't understand what does the above mentioned code locks.
In other words, what code should I use in order not to lock anything?

=> apparently the records remain locked after the edit-statement. I 
didn't have this problem when using Access 97. It seems that 
Access2002 has much more features for client-server structures but 
I'll have to learn how to use them. Therefore I would like to know as 
what type and what options I have to give to my recordset in order to 
achieve that each record is un-locked directly after the rst.UPDATE 
statement. In the help-files I didn't find an answer that solved my 
problem...

Any help appreciated.
Thanks.
surotkin







Please zip all files prior to uploading to Files section. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AccessDevelopers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to