I am really sorry for that.
This time, before release, I am running the UMTP Server at 150.183.253.143/8010 instead of umtp.mcs.anl.gov. You can download new AG Connector from AG Connector web page. Please note that this new version is not compatible with previous version. - Namgon _____ From: Nagykaldi, Zsolt F. (HSC) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:49 AM To: NamGon Kim; [email protected] Subject: RE: [AG-TECH] Firewall and unicast questions The UMTP server associated with the AG connector has been unreachable for over a month. The connector comes back with an error message and prompts to "use other server..", but there are no other options given. Any suggestions on what we supposed to do? Zsolt _ _ _ Zsolt Nagykaldi, PhD Research Associate, Clinical IT Specialist University Of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Department Of Family And Preventive Medicine Oklahoma Center For Family Medicine Research 900 NE 10th Street Oklahoma City, OK 73104 Phone: (405) 271-8000 Ext.:1-32212 Fax: (405) 271-1682 _____ From: [email protected] on behalf of NamGon Kim Sent: Thu 4/6/2006 7:42 PM To: Masullo, Chris F; [email protected] Subject: RE: [AG-TECH] Firewall and unicast questions Dear Chris, My name is Namgon Kim. I am developing a multicast connectivity solution for AG which can be used under firewall. AG Connector is the name of my solution. I hope you to test AG Connector in your network. It encapsulates multicast data of AG and uses one port number (8010) for connection with outside of firewall. If you use AG Connector, since what you need to do is opening 8010 port, firewall traversal will be easier. Your can download and see some documentation from here. http://ace.nm.gist.ac.kr/AG_Connector/ If you need any question about AG Connector, let me know. - Namgon > -----Original Message----- > From: Masullo, Chris F [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 1:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AG-TECH] Firewall and unicast questions > > Hello All, > > We currently have our AG nodes outside our firewall, however cyber > security > has told us that we need to move the systems inside our firewall. The > last > time I brought up this issue a number of years ago I was told that > multicast > would not get past our firewall. I have some questions regarding this > issue. > > Has anyone successfully placed an AG VTC system behind a Cisco Firewall? > Are there any issues using unicast mode for and AG node behind a > firewall? > If not then why not run unicast? > > I have looked through the mailer however I do not see any answers to > these > Questions. > > Thanks in advance > > > > Chris Masullo Information Technology Division > Brookhaven National Laboratory Network Engineering & Operations > 61 Brookhaven Ave. Phone: (631) 344-2326 > Upton, NY 11973 Fax: (631) 344-7688
