Hi all Can ConferenceXP and AGTk interop?
thanks wansin Bob Riddle <[email protected]> Sent by: [email protected] 19/08/2005 09:16 AM To John Langkals <[email protected]> cc "'Cindy Sievers'" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject Re: [AG-TECH] Conference XP vs AG It resembles the AG, where all the nodews "join" a specific multicast group. There are Venue Servers that, as the AG venue server also does, tells the client which multicast group is associated with the selected Venue. John Langkals wrote: AG Tech, Bob, and Cindy, How does Conference XP initiate, maintain, and teardown the connection between sites/nodes? Is it a SIP/H.323 ITU like IP dialing protocol or does it resemble the AccessGrid/VRVS virtual venue HTTPS certificate server model. Thank you, John John Langkals Systems Manager OCTS M2021 Physics Research Building 191 West Woodruff Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43210 614.292.6957 Office 614.327.3732 Cell 614.292.7557 FAX www.octs.osu.edu<http://www.octs.osu.edu/> -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Riddle Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 1:14 PM To: Cindy Sievers Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] Conference XP vs AG Here are my observations (overlooking the Windows-only thing): 1. ConfXP is more "user-friendly" - you don't need a node operator, unix expert, a magic wand, or need to wave a dead chicken & chant to make it work. 2. The video is much better - ConfXP takes advantage of the Windows Media API's and does a very nice job rendering the video & audio - lipsynch has not been a problem for me in my test sessions with folks in Europe. 3. A "bridge" is provided for multicast-challenged users and to use it, the user simply uses a pull-down menu item on their ConfXP. 4. the integration of the client with the TabletPC is compelling (at least to me). It allows the instructor/presenter to face the "audience" instead of pointing at a screen and allows interactive mark-ups on the presentation. 5. you can specify point-to-point connections for two sites, and it seems to work well for the bandwidth challenged locations. Thats my $.02 Cindy Sievers wrote: Hi everyone, I was just wondering if anyone has had a chance to test Microsoft Conference XP? What are the major differences between AG and Conference XP? (aside from the fact that Conference XP only runs on a windows macine) I was looking at their documentation, and they use the exact terminology that AG does, almost the same equipment list, and seem to have the same results.....but I just wanted to hear from folks who have actually used it.... We are going to do a collaborative education project with a remote site who is leaning toward Conference XP and they want to know what the differences are and what the compelling arguments are for either.... Thanks Cindy ============================================ Cindy Sievers Los Alamos National Laboratory [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Group CCS-1 MS B287 tel:505.665.6602 Advanced Computing fax:505.665.4939 Los Alamos, NM 87544 ============================================ -- Bob Riddle ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Technologist,Internet2 1000 Oakbrook, Suite 300 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 Business Phone: 734.913.4257 Fax Number: 734.913.4255 "An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field." Niels Bohr
