I found it on a hidden folder c:\documents and settings\ag\Program Files\AccessGrid\local services\VideoConsumerService
I translated the path, our "Datos de programa" it is your "Program Files" (I'm not completely sure tough, just look for a hidden folder under c:\ (or your installation partition). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Miller" <[email protected]> To: "Natalia Costas Lago" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 5:32 PM Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] Multi Display Cards Recommendation > Could you explain to me how you upgraded your vic on the XP display > machine? I have the new version of vic, but I can't seem to find the old > version installed anywhere except in a few zip files. > THanks, > Jim > > > Natalia Costas Lago wrote: > >> >> We bought a Matrox QID PCIe Low Profile and got the same problem. It >> seems we found a workaround that was to replace VIC 1.1.3 by VIC 1.1.6 (i >> got this version from UCL mbone tools that is more or less the same but a >> few changes). >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter DeSantis" >> <[email protected]> >> To: "John I Quebedeaux Jr" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "Derek Piper" <[email protected]>; "Todd Zimmerman" <[email protected]>; >> "'ag-tech'" <[email protected]>; "Westgrid-AGTECH" >> <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:41 AM >> Subject: re[4]: [AG-TECH] Multi Display Cards Recommendation >> >> >>> We used XP sp2, Asus mainboards, 3.0ghz intel cpu etc etc. >>> >>> Im sure i sure 1 or 2 posts from someone else about this issue and that >>> there possibly was a fix, but we never tested it out. >>> I think the post stated links to 2 upgraded versions of vic that they >>> stated fixed the problem, but it wasnt clear that they were in fact >>> running in independentat screen mode to see the problem. >>> >>> As for the resolution matrox claim there is a tool on thier wesbite that >>> allows you to add this custom resoltuion, but i aint testededd it. >>> For what it is worth my opinion is that if you aint gonna use one of the >>> vic variations that allow greater than 388x252 pixel capture you should >>> not look to use anyhting higher than 1280x1024. >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> >> Hi Peter, I realize this is a month later... but going back through >>> >> messages I found yours. >>> >>> >>> >> Well, I can confirm this behavior as well with the product now >>> having >> just >>> >> gotten the card in one of our nodes to try. I haven't tried that >>> >> resolution though, but have the screen corruption you talked >>> about. >> Did >>> >> it happen with any other application besides Vic?Any fix to this >>> >> problem? >>> >> Seemed to duplicate from screens 1 to 2 and 3 to 4. So we had to >>> >> resort >>> >> to the stretch mode and since our setup was just 2 projectors and 2 >>> >> monitors we went with 2x2 such that the windows taskbar stayed on >>> >> the >>> >> operator monitors and had to drag stuff "up" to the projectors. >> >>> Annoying >>> >> for me, but worked. >>> >>> >>> >> Which OS were you doing this on? >>> >>> >>> >> Thanks, John Q. >>> >> -- >> John I. Quebedeaux, Jr. >>> >> Louisiana State University >>> >> Computer Manager / LBRN & CCT / 131 Life Sciences Bldg. & 339 >>> Johnston >>> >> Hall >>> >> e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] / web: >>> http://lbrn.lsu.edu >> & >>> >> http://cct.lsu.edu >>> >> phone: 225-578-0062 / fax: 225-578-2597 >>> >>> >>> >> On Jun 9, 2005, at 8:49 PM, Peter DeSantis wrote: >>> >>> >
