Hi,
Are there any goals/changes already being considered for AG3? It would
be helpful for all of us to know what (if any) the basic changes already
proposed are.
Derek
Thomas D. Uram wrote:
> Hi Steve:
>
> You may have heard of the 'standards' committee, the purpose of which is
> to standardize interfaces in the toolkit. Activities of this group have
> not ramped up yet, but will do so soon.
>
> We're definitely interested in engaging the AG developer community
> outside of Argonne in development discussions. If you're interested in
> contributing ideas related to the software, whether in design,
> functionality, or enhancements, they are most welcome. We've tried to
> provide mechanisms for developers to get involved, such as AG
> Enhancement Proposals for functionality and bugzilla for enhancements.
> We will be trying to open this up to more community involvement; the
> first step will be the creation of a developer mailing list, with other
> steps to follow. Meanwhile, if you want to discuss a particular aspect
> of the software, don't hesitate to start the discussion here.
>
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> On 05/16/05 19:44, Steve Smith wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've heard passing mention of a committee being formed regarding AG
>> version 3. What is the status of this, and what is the process for
>> having an input to this?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Steve
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Derek Piper - [email protected] - (812) 856 0111
IRI 323, School of Informatics
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
