> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On >> Behalf Of Steve Smith >> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 9:51 PM >> To: ag-tech >> Subject: [AG-TECH] Per-node certificates >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there any plan to re-institute per-node AG2 certificates, and if >> not >> what's the current accepted practise for multi-user, multi-machine >> node >> setups? >> >> Cheers, >> Steve >>
On 05/02/2005, at 4:42 AM, Steve Gallo wrote: > > I believe that you can use an anonymous certificate, although > I think that there are some restrictions on what you can/can't > do with them. > That is a good use for Anonymous certificates. Their potential shortcoming is if/when ACL's are used for secure meetings (very rarely done so far). If I were setting up a secure meeting room, my first general "deny" rule would be aimed at any Anonymous certificate. Mind you, I'm not sure that thats possible with the current ACL's, but an ideal system should "allow" or "deny" classes of certificate such as Anonymous. chris Christoph Willing Ph: +61 7 3365 8350 QPSF Access Grid Manager University of Queensland
