Hello,

Currently there are a significant number of users around the community that are 
using InSORS and AG1/PIG systems that use static multicast address->venue 
mappings. My question is that with the dynamic address mapping that is being 
suggested, are Argonne going to use an address range that is different to that 
already registered with static venues?
The problem that I can see is that we use our system for teaching etc. If one 
of these sessions was happening and a random user of AG 2 just appeared in the 
venue all confidence in the Access Grid idea could be destroyed. In that 
scenario also who would have the right to use the venue? As far as we would be 
concerned the AG 2 user would have to go away and find another venue as that IP 
address was already in use.

David


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dr. David Wallom

Operations Director

Centre for e-Research Bristol

Rm 4.56

H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory

Tyndall Avenue

Bristol

BS8 1TL



Tel +44 (0)117 928 8769

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to