At 07:08 AM 10/28/2004 +0200, Ulrich Schwenn wrote: >Richard, > >do you really mean remote, i.e. any (a) or at least one (b) participating >node should be allowed to control your camera(s)?. >Case (a) would lead to chaos, because n different people will have n >different views makes n! possibilities, thus (b) will never assure an >optimal position. >Case (b) could be useful, if you can trust somebody and dont have the time >or manpower do do it on your own site. >If you just mean remote but in your room, this is of course useful, but >then you can use the standard RS.232 control of your Sony. >If you have an audience, where people might feel supervised by external >remote control it could become interesting for the unions. >So better keep camera control under your control.
Yes chaos = case A, but I wondered if anyone actually tried it. I agree under a restricted access the remote control has many possibilities. rich
