>> >> >> We're working on the Fedora stuff now, it's coming along quickly. >> Fedora.
Core 1 or Core 2? >> >> > >We are building machines with our internal build tools, >> > which is moving >> > >us to Gentoo. Gentoo support for the AGTk is not official, >> > but you can >> > >expect it will become official in a very short time. >> So gentoo then? >> > >RedHat 7.3 does not have python 2.2.3+ available, RedHat 9.0 >> > is already >> > >abandoned. >> > > >> > >This serves as official notice that we will not be supporting RedHat >> > >7.3 or 9.0, effective as soon as we have a working Fedora Project >> > >distribution available. > So not gentoo, but Fedora then? i'm a little surprised to see lack of replies to any of this thread. Setting up a new, multimachine AG 2.x node is my *job*. i would really like to have a better idea of which distribution will be supported - fully - without tricks and patches and adding this, that and the other to seven different config/dat files. Stable is the name of the game - the big node cannot and will not be changed willynilly. i've heard rumblings of AG 2.3. Am i wasting my time with AG 2.2 then? i spent *a lot* of time beating my head against the wall with RH7.3 and the AGtk 2.2. The client would hang on venue room changes. Then it mysteriously (and by mysteriously i mean no changes made on my end) started working again. Then stopped and this notice came out. i guess i'm tired of feeling in "limbo" here. Is it Fedora Core1, Fedora Core 2, or Gentoo? i have people that put up a good deal of money and purchased some very expensive equipment and it is stuck on AG1.x at this time because i have no idea what OS will be supported. i really do need a solid answer on: 1) which distro? 2) AG 2.3 - wait for that or move ahead with AG2.2 Thank you. jmb
