Oops, I forgot to use 'Reply to All'. I'm getting a password error on a WinXP machine with the same user certs that I use on other machines. I've checked that the certs that I imported are not corrupted and my configuration seems ok. How do I check the trusted certs and where do I get them if they don't come with the installation?
Thanks, Jon. -- Jon I Johansson * Research Computing Support [email protected] * Computing and Network Services Tel.: (780) 492-9304 * University of Alberta Fax.: (780) 492-1729 * Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Supreeya Miller > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:58 PM > To: Randy Groves; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and above on Win2K? > > > Randy, > > At CHL, we are running a room node with 4 machines. The > Display machine is > running Windows 2000. > > The 2.1.2 installation was easy and smooth. However, I had > an installation > problem on a PIG XP that it did not have a trusted > certificate and reported > as having a bad password entered instead. > > Supreeya Miller > Visualization Researcher, System Administrator, and Access > Grid Coordinator > Center of Higher Learning > Building 1103 > Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 > 228-688-2190 > Internal Mail Box: 10002 > [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On > Behalf Of Randy Groves > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:44 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and above on Win2K? > > > First of all, are people successfully running 2.1.2 on Win2K? > I've had > some problems recently getting it running on this platform - at this > juncture, I don't remember the details. But this issue looks > like it's > going to raise it's head again, so I'll probably have to revisit it. > > But that brings up a larger question, which is significant in our > situation, where XP is just now starting to be installed in selected > areas. Is Win2K a dead platform as far as the AG is concerned? > > -randy >
