We're running a Winnov 4400 with two cameras (and have tested with
4) under Windows XP and are getting good reports of our video
quality from remote sites.  I haven't looked for a way of getting
rid of the grey (gray!) surrounds yet, though.

Cheers

Chris

____________________________________________________________________
Chris Osland                                               Office tel: +44
(0) 1235 446565
Digital Media and Access Grid                          Medialab tel: +44 (0)
1235 446459
BIT Department                                     Access Grid room tel: +44
(0) 1235 445666
e-mail:   [email protected]                                       Fax: +44
(0) 1235 445597
CLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (Bldg. R18)
Chilton, DIDCOT, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK
[The contents of this email are confidential and are for the use of the
intended recipient only.
If you are not the intended recipient do not take any action on it or show
it to anyone else,
but return this email to the sender and delete your copy of it.]





> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Randy Groves
> Sent: 06 April 2004 23:06
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [AG-TECH] Quality of video in vic from Videum boards
> 
> 
> I have to say that I'm not real impressed with the quality of 
> the video 
> that I see in the vic that is captured from a Winnov 1000 VO. 
>  I also seem 
> to remember thinking the same thing when I first saw the 
> output in the vic 
> that came from a Winnov 4400.  I just installed one in a 
> machine that also 
> has two Osprey 100 cards, and the difference is quite 
> apparent.   The video 
> in the vics from the Ospreys is clean and not pixelated at 
> all.  The video 
> from the vic that is coming from the Videum is quite pixelated.
> 
> Is this just a basic problem?  Or is there a configuration 
> that I'm not 
> getting right?  Am I correct in thinking that the video 
> output format from 
> the card is significant to vic?  And if so, what is the 
> optimum setting for 
> this?  I've played with all that the Videum exposes (with 
> VidCap32), but it 
> doesn't seem to make much difference.  Leave aside the fact that the 
> configuration tools for the Videum cards don't seem to have 
> the same set of 
> option tweaking capability that VidCap32 has, for instance.  
> And since 
> there doesn't seem to be a way to modify these, you are left 
> with making 
> registry hacks.
> 
> I thought that Winnov was supposed to have superior Windows 
> drivers, but so 
> far I'm not that impressed.
> 
> -randy
> 
> 

Reply via email to