No, but don't you think that sometimes we have to or forced to pay more for some facility just because we are blind and had we not been blind, maybe, we could have managed without that particular facility. FOr example, a sighted person can walk home from bus stand or railway station but most of us have to hire a Rikshaw or maybe take an auto to reach our destination. Similarly, most of us depend on readers, a few of us who are fortunate enough to own a computer, for reading books? And of course, pay for it? We demand for concessions not only because we are blind but because we have to pay extra to face a particular situation or to be at par with others. Dr. Rakesh Jain Mobile (Reliance): 09336787900 Mobile (BSNL): 09415787900 Residence: 05224001112 and 05222732345 Skype ID: dr.rjain
----- Original Message ----- From: "RAJAT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <accessindia@accessindia.org.in> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:57 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Who should pay for concessions? > Hi all, > > Aren't we coming to somewhere near the concept of creamy layer among > ourselves. Those who require and those who do not. But, one thing for sure > we all want the disabled friendly/fully accessible environment. Can this > happen with concessions? > > Its a common practice that if you want additional features./facilities you > have to pay more for that. And if we are getting the facilities we demand > then we should come forward and pay for that. > > We should also not forget that Income tax department, Govt. of India gives > tax deduction under section 80u of Rs. 75,000 or 50,000 as the case may be > and its also for those parents who have a disabled child. This is given to > compensate for the hardship we face in our day to day life. Is this not a > big relief? > > Also if I am not wrong persons under VH and OH category but not HH, get > double the conveyance/transport allowance then other govt. employees get. > > I believe we should demand for more and more facilities/equal > participation > in education, transport, banking, building by laws, .... And concessions > should be for those who really need them. > > Correct me if I am wrong. > > Regards > > Rajat agarwal > New Delhi > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kiran Kaja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <accessindia@accessindia.org.in> > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 11:33 PM > Subject: [AI] Who should pay for concessions? > > >> Hi all, >> >> Having followed the thread on DGCA guidelines and the subsequent > discussion >> of concessions for the blind or escorts, I have been thinking about it >> for > a >> couple of days. >> >> I feel that in our country, the existence of public sector in businesses >> like transport and education has benifitted persons with blindness. If >> all >> the industry and utility services were run by private firms, I don't > imagine >> they would come forward with so many concessions and exemptions for us. >> Providing concessions is much simpler for public sector or government. >> However, this raises a big question of who should eventually pay for the >> concessions? >> >> As citizens of the country, we are entitled to lead a life which closely >> resembles a sighted or normal person who doesn't have a disability. This >> obviously entails extra expenditure because of various reasons. To offset >> this additional cost, concessions and exemptions are provided. I strongly >> feel that since the government collects taxes from individuals as well as >> businesses in the private sector, it should be the one paying for these >> concessions. If the Railways were privatised, the cost of providing >> concession to blind persons should be born by the government and not by > the >> private company which runs the railways. If a private company voluntarily >> comes forward with concessions, it is a very good gesture on their part. > But >> if concessions are imposed by law, the cost of these concessions should >> be >> reimbursed. >> >> For instance, when most of the other passengers of airlines were paying > full >> fair for their tickets, blind persons were only paying half. If we put >> the >> social argument of concession aside for a while, the airline company was >> loozing money by carrying blind passengers. The airline company in > question >> also pays the same tax irrespective of offering concessions. So, there is > no >> insentive at all for the airline company by carrying blind passengers. On >> the contrary, the company gets less money. >> >> I think it is the responsibility of the government to provide or pay for > the >> concessions as they should look after the welfare of its citizens. >> Private >> companies or public sector companies for that matter should never be > forced >> to bear the cost of concessions. >> >> What do you all think about this? I know this is never going to happen in >> India. >> >> Regards, >> Kiran. >> >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, > please visit the list home page at >> > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> > > To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, > please visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
