some of this confusion can be traced to central laws as seen in website
thhp://ccdisabilities.nic.in

there is some memo on evaluation of disabilities and that appendix2 and 3 is
not loaded into website

while in pwd act there should be strict uniformity of clubbing disability
into vi hi and oh no matter what partiality

an dthen selection by standard ways

just as there are no divii\sion in caste like partial caste etc

there has to be straight line somewhere


On 1/20/07, Pamnani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is another public interest litigation filed against the Maharashtra
> Government.
> It is mainly on the point that the totally blind do not get jobs while the
> partially sighted get these jobs.
> Here is the last order passed by the Bombay High Court. Need your comments
> so that a proper reply can be submitted.
>     This kind of matter needs deep thought and proper consideration with
> plenty of discussion. all views are welcome off and on the list.
>
>
>
>
> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
>
> CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
>
> PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.75 OF 2006
>
>
>
> Satyashodh & Ors.
>
> ......Petitioners.
>
>
>
> V/s
>
>
>
> State of Maharashtra & Ors. .....
>
> Respondents.
>
>
>
>
>
> Mr. U.P. Warunjikar for Petitioners.
>
> Mr. V.P. Malwankar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
>
>
>
>
>
> CORAM: H.L. GOKHALE &
>
> V.M.KANADE, JJ.
>
> DATE : JANUARY 10, 2007
>
>
>
> P.C.
>
>
>
> 1. Mr. Warunjikar, the learned Counsel for Petitioners, seeks to add
> National Association for Blinds and National Federation for Blinds as the
> additional respondents. They are to be added with a view to give some more
> information on the question which is involved in this matter.
>
>
>
> 2. Amendment to be carried out by Tuesday the 16 January, 2007. Issue
> notice to the added respondents, returnable on 24th January, 2007.
>
>
>
> 3. Mr. Malwankar, the learned AGP appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1
> and 2, states that he will take instructions from the Commissioner for
> handicapped persons as to whether the Commissioner can make two
> recommendations to the State Government - (i) Whether certain kinds of jobs
> such as those of Telephone Operators etc. wherever reserved for blinds could
> be reserved only for the totally blind persons and (ii) whether the
> Commissioner can make general recommendation to the State Government that as
> far as other kinds of jobs are concerned, 50% of those jobs could be
> reserved only for totally blind persons.
>
>
>
> 4. S.O. to 24th January, 2007.
>
>
>
> (H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
>
>
>
> (V.M. KANADE, J.)
>
>
>
>
>
> Kanchan Pamnani
> Advocate & Solicitor
> 9, Suleman Chambers,
> Battery Street, Colaba,
> Mumbai - 400 039.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the subject unsubscribe.
>
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
> please visit the list home page at
> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>



-- 
tushar s kansara

303, shalaka, telli galli cross lane, andheri east, mumbai 400069

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to