Guys, For those who are using braille notetaker or a braille refreshable display, I would like to understand how fast it is to read on such devices given the fact that it has a capacity of displaying limited cells and works on automatic scrolling?
As a lawyer I can say that braille definitely helps in presentations or in reading large documents with focus (speed may be same even on laptops). But maintaining consistent focus is a challenge. I am confused whether to go for a notetaker or a braille refreshable display. Purely from a reading perspective, what makes more sense? Or is it the case that braille papers are still the fastest and efficient way to read? In that case, does electronic braille embosser make more sense? That would take me to another question; what level of proof reading or editing is required after entering the text in braille translation softwares like Duxbury? Looking at my requirement, what would anyone (including Karishma Enterprises) suggest? If I compare this notetaker with Hims Braille Refreshable Display, then in Hims I get 80 cells capacity (approximately two or three lines). Looking forward for your inputs. Warm Regards, -- Amar Jain. Website: www.amarjain.com Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
