hello sir,
let me explain the down sides of talk back  by comparing it with voice
over by apple. Because these are the two leading smart phone  gesture
based screen readers.
1.  Less responsive: talkback is less responsive when compared to
voice over. it needs to repeat the gestures several times. hardware
engineering is concerned in this regards, still it should be improoved
for the performance of a gesture based screen reader.
2. Usability of fundamental features: the basic features like text
editing operations, element navigation(in browsing)  should be more
handy. when compared to voice over, voice over provides a feature
called rotor.  such kind of features must be added.
3. basic gesture shortcuts: in voice over there are several gestures
to turn off the speech, turn of the display, switch between active
apps etc. they should be introduced in talkback which will make
talkback outstanding in usability.

in my opinion it is better to improove talkback by placing voice over
performance as a ideal one and work to achieve that.
then accessibility of certain apps must be improoved.
really some people   uses screen readers in smart phones will never
leave apple voice over   if they can afford it. it is because of these
reasons.
if we can improove this, everyone will have a chance to use the best
with less money.  we really appreciate your initiative.



-- 
With Warm Regards,
Rejin Jose
email:m2re...@gmail.com
cell:8281293699

Have a Great Day......


Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/

To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to