1/31/22, 6:17 PM about:blank about:blank 1/2 Decade-old divorce battle ends
with reunion Court Orders Immediate Release Of Wife 'Incarcerated' In Mental
Hosp For 12 Yrs, Husband Takes Her Home swati.deshpa...@timesgroup.com
Mumbai: A decade-long divorce battle ended on a happy note with the husband
taking the wife home after her 12-year-long 'incarceration' at a mental
health hospital following a magistrate's order. The family court in Bandra,
in its December order, also noted its own struggle to get a review board to
assess and get the woman released, seven years after the mental hospital had
discharged her but her husband refused to take her home. "This is a case,
where only because the wife was not allowed in the matrimonial home, she had
to languish in a regional mental hospital even after discharge," judge Swati
Chauhan said. The couple got married in 1993. On the husband's application
abo[1]ut his wife's mental health, a metropolitan magistrate in 2009 passed
a 'reception order' based on which she was sent to the mental hospital. In
2012, her husband filed for divorce on the grounds of "cruelty and
unsoundness of mind". Judge Chauhan heard the case for the first time in
October 2021. "The Mental Healthcare Act 2017 promulgates to protect,
promote and fulfill the rights of such persons during delivery of mental
healthcare and service and matters connected therewith. But this court found
it arduous to search and lay hands on the mental health review board.
Unfortunately, the wife could not benefit from the new law," the family
court order said. "Many may be languishing in mental hospitals. Therefore,
it is necessary to create awareness about the procedure to approach mental
health review boards. " Article 21 of the Constitution ensures that no
person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except via a legal
procedure, noted the judge. It includes the right to a dignified life, she
said, adding that it can "only sympathize" with the wife who "spent 12 years
of her life under confinement of a regional mental hospital, which is no
less than incarceration". The court said in 2014, the medical
superintendent, in compliance with the Act, ordered her 1/31/22, 6:17 PM
about:blank about:blank 2/2 discharge as she was found fit. The wife and a
nurse were sent home, but the husband "refused to keep her home" and she was
again 'detained' at the mental hospital. Pointing out that "this is a
classic example of how a reception order was misused to drive out a wife
from the matrimonial home and restrict her reentry", the court said it was
"aghast" at the reason given that the divorce case was pending. The court
said it was "disturbing" that no one checked on her at the hospital; neither
her child on turning a major, nor her brother. The court appointed its
deputy reg istrar as her guardian and sent several production warrants to
the hospital. The hospital produced her in court last October when warned of
facing adverse inference for "lackadaisical approach". The wife said she
wanted to see her child, expressed no animosity to the husband and wondered
why she was still in hospital when she was declared fit for release. The
court appointed advocate Shabnam Kazi as amicus curiae and a panel of
doctors to examine her and submit its report, which it did on November 22,
stating that she is fit for discharge. The panel said the hospital continued
to implement the 1987 Act though the 2017 Act stipulates that those with
mental illness have a right to live in society and to not continue at an
institution merely because s/he has no family. The husband initially said he
would house her at a shelter home and bear all expenses, but Kazi opposed
and said he would have to provide her alternative accommodation. The court
agreed. The husband then said he would find a house for her in the same
locality. But on November 27, when the court directed her immediate
discharge from the mental hospital, he said he will take her home. The court
said: "All's well that ends well. "



-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

-- 
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to accessindia+unsubscr...@accessindia.org.in.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/000a01d816a0%24ea287cd0%24be797670%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to