Here is an example of the flaws of American democracy from the point of view of the disabled. Forwarded message. But perhaps we also need to advocate for accessible issues of the electoral process in India.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:46 PM
Subject: VICUG-NYC just in case you HAVA problem voting for yourself on November 4


note: an extensively hyperlinked hypertext version of this post is
     located at: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/blog/hava2008.html

                         Just In Case You HAVA Problem
                  Voting for Yourself (Yet Again) This Year
                               (2008 Edition)

       [reference note: the full text of HAVA -- the Help Americans
       Vote Act of 2002 -- can be found at:
       http://www.fec.gov/hava/law_ext.txt]

Tuesday, November 4, 2008, is Election Day, and for some of us it will be
the first opportunity to test the HAVA (Help Americans Vote Act)
stipulation that in EVERY polling place there be at least ONE machine
accessible to the blind and visually impaired, allowing us to vote
autonomously, unaccompanied by sighted assistants or poll workers whom
one cannot always trust to pull the correct lever; especially when one's
voting for a non-traditional candidate, such as Ralph Nader or Leonard
Peltier, or for a fringe party. Years ago, in Jersey City, where i then
resided, a poll worker who was in the voting booth with me to select
candidates argued with me for over 15 minutes when i told her that i was
voting the Green Party for president and bullet voting for any other race
in which a member of the Socialist Workers' Party fielded a candidate...
The poll worker, in a voice usually reserved for animals and those for
whom english is not their first language, insisted that there were only
two parties from which to choose: Democrat and Republican... i cannot
honestly say how my vote was cast in 2000, but at least -- in that
respect -- i am not alone.

i also am wary of relying on voting by absentee ballot as a substitute
for going to a polling place and voting in person. The limitations and
problems with absentee ballots are legion: absentee ballots obviously
need to be filled out by a third party, but -- although the advent of
early voting by absentee ballot may mitigate this in those states where
early voting by absentee ballot is permitted -- most of all because
absentee ballots are hardly ever even opened, especially when the margin
of victory of one candidate is larger than the number of absentee ballots
received, for, counting them -- according to state election boards -- would be a waste of time, money, and resources -- despite the fact that:

  Every vote is supposed to count equally, no matter how cast; and
  Voting for non-traditional slash third party candidates can help
  them qualify for public campaign funding during the next election
  cycle... In the interest of letting the polling persons know that
  there are actually people out there who actually need and will use
  the adaptive interface, and to test their state of residence's
  commitment to comply fully with HAVA this year, i encourage
  everyone i know to make a special point of voting in person. When
  i attempted to test new jersey's self-congratulatory claims that
  it was fully compliant with HAVA during the 2006 mid-term elections,
  no one at my designated polling place knew what i was talking about
  when i asked to use the accessible machine and it took a visit to
  Municipal Hall, conversations with the Town Clerk, the county
  Elections Board, and the State Elections Board requesting that
  someone contact my polling place to tell the poll workers there what
  the adaptive input-output interface looked like, where and how to
  hook it up, and how to turn it on and use it. Three hours later, the
  adaptive input-ouput alternate keyboard was located and they finally
  succeeded in hooking the accessible, audio-output interface to the
  electronic voting machine -- they're all electronic in NJ since 2006
  -- but the interface didn't work at all, allowing neither input, nor
  output, so there was no way for me to cast my vote unassisted...

  The reason a state's claim of full compliance with the HAVA's 7
  specific requirements, is that one of the seven explicitly states:

  * A means to ensure that voters with disabilities, including voters
    with visual impairments, will be able to vote independently
    without third party assistance by providing each polling place
    with at least one direct recording electronic voting system or
    other voting system equipped for individuals with disabilities;
                         [source: http://www.fec.gov/hava/law_ext.txt]

  So, get out and vote! Make your voice heard -- it's the only way
  they'll know we're out here!

   _________________________________________________________________

New Jersey

  The official web site of the state of New Jersey contains an
  excellent resource for accessibility issues and the polls in NJ,
  located at:

  [http://www.nj.gov/state/elections/voter-rights.html]

  which includes a Voter Report Form for Polling Place Accessibility
  Concerns, which can be filled out online at:

  [http://www.state.nj.us/lps/elections/voting_access_feedback_form.html]

  if you, as a resident of New Jersey encountered any difficulty with
  casting your own vote independently using equipment required by state
  and federal law, PLEASE let the state know by filling out the
  Polling Place Accessibility form, referenced above.

    _________________________________________________________________

New York

  New York set itself a deadline of November 2007 for compliance with
  HAVA, so this will be the first time, in a general election, that New
  York residents will be able to cast their vote autonomously, and
  accurately, at any and all polling sites in the state of New York.
  there is limited supply of information about HAVA compliance at the
  State of New York's web site, most of the information available
  through this resource are untagged PDF files.

* Help America Vote Act/Protection & Advocacy for Voter Access (PAVA)
 in NY [http://www.cqcapd.state.ny.us/HAVA-PAVA.htm]

* Voting Protection in the State of New York
[http://www.cqcapd.state.ny.us/newsletter/issue90/votingprotection.htm]

* State of New York HAVA Implementation Plan (PDF file)
[http://www.ogs.state.ny.us/purchase/biddocument/22300VotingSystemPlan.pdf
]

* HAVA Implementation Plan: September 29, 2007 (PDF file)
[http://www.elections.state.ny.us/NYSBOE/hava/DraftHAVAImplementationPlan0
9292007-R.pdf]

* Guidelines for Ballot Counting (PDF file)
[http://www.elections.state.ny.us/NYSBOE/hava/guidelinesforballotcounting2
0068206.pdf]

    _________________________________________________________________

Connecticut

  Although Connecticut missed its January 1, 2006 deadline for
  compliance with HAVA, an attorney at the Connecticut Secretary of
  State's office informed me that the state IS in compliance for this
  november's election. this means that if you attempt to vote in
  connecticut, but there is either no accessible polling mechanism, a
  non-functional accessible voting machine, or no one who had been
  trained on how to work the machine in its accessible mode, allowing
  you to vote privately and independently, you should complain to the
  voting registrar of the municipality or county in which you live, to
  tell them where and when you encountered problems, and you can call
  the State Attorney General's office at: 1 860 509 6000

  The state of Connecticut's official HAVA compliance declaration
  can be found at:

  [http://www.sots.ct.gov/sots/cwp/view.asp?A=3179&QUESTION_ID=392226]

  but be forewarned, most of the information available through this
  resource is contained in untagged PDF files.
    _________________________________________________________________

Federal HAVA Resources

* full text of HAVA: The Help Americans Vote Act of 2002 (plain text)
[http://www.fec.gov/hava/law_ext.txt]

* FEC Voting System Standards (Federal Register Notice)
[http://www.fec.gov/agenda/agendas2001/mtgdoc01-62/01-62a/frnotice.htm]
    _________________________________________________________________

Informative Voting Resources

    * FactCheck dot org
      [http://www.factcheck.org/]

    * SourceWatch: monitors whose money is behind what campaign
      literature, propaganda, and 527s
      [http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=SourceWatch]
    _________________________________________________________________



----------------------------------------------------------------
CONSERVATIVE, n.  A statesman who is enamored of existing evils,
as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them
with others.         -- Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's Dictionary_
----------------------------------------------------------------
            Gregory J. Rosmaita, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html
----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
for the latest updates & info call the VICUG NYC HOTLINE (212) 714-4967
----------------------------------------------------------------------
VICUG NYC                http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html
MEETING SCHEDULE      http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/schedule.html
MOVING TARGETS http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/moving.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this emailing list, type the command:
UNSUBSCRIBE VIC-NYC
in the BODY of an emessage, and send it to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------



To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
 http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to