Hello Umesha,
Legal provisions are there. these are very efficacious. so, as always,
issue comes down of their implementation.


On 4/7/12, Umesha Economics <umesha....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think there should be a legislation for such provisions. since it is a
> public place, government can make rules regarding providing accessibility or
> perhaps technically called barrier free environment.
>
> Umesha
> .
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Prashant Ranjan Verma" <pr_ve...@hotmail.com>
> To: "accessindia@accessindia. org. in " <accessindia@accessindia.org.in>
> Sent: Thursday, 05 April, 2012 5:13 PM
> Subject: [AI] FW: Where is right to enjoy for people with disabilities?
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Sonu Golkar [mailto:sonug.m...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 05 April 2012 17:06
>> To: invi...@yahoogroups.com; youngvoicesin...@googlegroups.com;
>> young-vo...@googlegroups.com; red-india-disabil...@googlegroups.com;
>> red-india-developm...@googlegroups.com;
>> red-india-corpor...@googlegroups.com
>> Cc: Victor John Cordeiro; Sridhar LCD SARO; Shivaram LCD SARO; Shivaram
>> Deshpande; Rajendra LCD SARO; Gopal Mitra; Divya S Wajapey; Devi LCD;
>> Barkha
>> LCD SARO; Swati Kaithwas; Sunitha K; Sunita dutta; Saurabh Kumar; Sarika
>> Sinha; Raghavendra BP; Raghavendra ActionAid; Raghavendra; narendra
>> sharma;
>> Nandini BK; meena artwani; manish.bh...@actionaidindia.org.in; jigyasa;
>> jayant; Dinesh Joshi; Anamika Roy; Vinay Ohdar; Vipin Rathore; Tharanum
>> Bano-UPVM; tenik mahato; surender surender; Sonu Golkar; Sonali Pal JVM;
>> shiv shankar; Sharada Yadav Puri; Shakthi CBR; sarita; ravi shastry needs;
>> Ranjit Varma UPVM; rajesh nimole; Prashanth Varma NAB; Pranab OVM; pranab
>> Kumar Sahu; PK Pincha; dadhich_prak...@yahoo.co.in; Niranjan Behera;
>> Narendra Modi JVM; IshwarPrasad Chata CVM; Hemanth Subuddi-OVM; hemanta
>> ddf;
>> bihar.viklang.adhikar.ma...@gmail.com; bali Bhosale MVM; arun Kumar singh;
>> Arun JVM; Anjum Taj; Anjum Chandru; anand malakar; suman09....@gmail.com;
>> Omprakash RJVm; Sanjay Mungi; Sherly; PM John; ASHA CBR
>> Subject: Where is right to enjoy for people with disabilities?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear         Friends,
>>
>>
>>
>>        What is the level of awareness about disability issues in amusement
>> parks? Do they care about accessibility & safety of people with
>> disabilities? Do they take steps to provide an equally enjoyable
>> experience
>> to their customers with disabilities? These are questions which are seldom
>> asked but they need to be answered to ensure full participation of people
>> with disabilities in the social life. A group of disabled youngsters faced
>> hard realities in their recent trip to an amusement park in New Delhi
>> India.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Young Voice Delhi group chose an amusement park named
>> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Adventure-Island-Rohini/132854526738969?sk=ap
>> p_2309869772> Adventure Island as the venue for its monthly meeting this
>> time. The objective behind this decision was to give an otherwise rare
>> opportunity to enjoy some of the thrilling rides to the members as well as
>> to contribute to sensitization of the park management and society in
>> general
>> by making a public presence of a group consisting of persons with
>> disabilities.
>>
>>
>>
>> <http://youngvoices.lcdisability.org/learn/> Young Voices is a global
>> campaign network which brings together young people with disabilities
>> between ages 16-25. These are the rallying cries of young people with
>> disabilities in 19 countries in Africa, Asia and the Americas. Together
>> they
>> form Young Voices, Leonard Cheshire Disability's global project that
>> campaigns for full human rights for disabled people.
>>
>>
>>
>> The group of 22 persons which visited Adventure Island on 1 April 2012
>> consisted of persons with blindness & low vision, a person with blindness
>> &
>> additional impairments of dwarfism & a few non-disabled friends & family
>> members. The mobility impaired members of the group chose not to go to the
>> park since they would have had to walk for long distances and as it is
>> they
>> would not have been able to enjoy any of the rides due to accessibility
>> and
>> safety considerations.
>>
>>
>>
>> The group representatives had clearly mentioned to the park authorities at
>> the time of ticket booking several weeks in advance that most members of
>> their group will be persons with disabilities. The park authorities after
>> initial hesitation accepted the booking with certain conditions. They said
>> that the group will not be provided any support staff and that they
>> reserve
>> the right to deny entry to some of the rides on grounds of safety.
>> However,
>> despite repeated reminders they never provided any information in writing
>> and all communication happened on telephone & SMS.
>>
>>
>>
>> On the day of the visit the park management seemed nervous when the group
>> gathered at the entry gates. They said that a representative & a security
>> guard will accompany the group inside the park. But since the group
>> members
>> divided themselves into four smaller groups the park representatives ended
>> up escorting only one small group while the other three groups went
>> unescorted. Trouble began when the park escorts started denying entry to
>> several rides. The other three groups which were moving on their own had
>> done those rides by that time and therefore the members felt that the park
>> should not deny those rides to other people with similar disabilities.
>> Moreover, the park management was not able to quantify the conditions
>> which
>> according to them made these rides dangerous for some of the group
>> members.
>> They did not have any written instructions based on parameters such as
>> age,
>> body weight etc. for eligibility to various rides. There decisions were
>> arbitrary and were based on physical appearance of the guests.
>>
>>
>>
>> When the group members opposed the decision of the park staff they tricked
>> the group and said that after lunch the group could enjoy more rides.
>> After
>> lunch which was part of the package paid for by the group the park
>> security
>> staff denied entry to the group inside the amusement area. The group
>> coordinators and mentors demanded explanation and they were told in clear
>> words that the group will not accept such humiliation and will take all
>> logical steps to safeguard their dignity. None of the senior staff of the
>> park came forward to give any explanation for denying entry into the park
>> and the group was left arguing with the security guards who said that they
>> were just following orders and could not take decisions themselves. After
>> the group did not give up and stuck to their positions inform of the entry
>> gate the park authorities finally allowed entry into the park. As a part
>> of
>> the package the group had to be given access to a shaded area with seating
>> arrangement for holding their meeting. Since much time was lost in
>> arguments
>> the group went to the meeting venue and held its discussions. In the
>> meeting
>> it was decided that the group would try to explore if there were any
>> guidelines or best practices for handling people with disabilities in such
>> amusement parks and will try to bring this incident to the notice of the
>> larger community through blogs & emails.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This Incident occurs even after India signed and ratified UN Convention on
>> the rights of persons with disabilities. The appropriate article of the
>> convention is reproduced below for the public awareness:
>>
>> ARTICLE 9 - ACCESSIBILITY
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. To enable Persons With Disabilities to live independently and
>> participate
>> fully in all aspects of life, States Parties shall take appropriate
>> measures
>> to ensure to Persons With Disabilities access, on an equal basis with
>> others, to the physical environment, to transportation, to information and
>> communications, including information and communications technologies and
>> systems, and to other facilities and services open or provided to the
>> public, both in urban and in rural areas. These measures, which shall
>> include the identification and elimination of obstacles and barriers to
>> accessibility, shall apply to, inter alia:
>>
>>
>>
>> (a) Buildings, roads, transportation and other indoor and outdoor
>> facilities, including schools, housing, medical facilities and workplaces;
>>
>>
>>
>> (b) Information, communications and other services, including electronic
>> services and emergency services.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. States Parties shall also take appropriate measures to:
>>
>>
>>
>> (a) Develop, promulgate and monitor the implementation of minimum
>> standards
>> and guidelines for the accessibility of facilities and services open or
>> provided to the public;
>>
>>
>>
>> (b) Ensure that private entities that offer facilities and services which
>> are open or provided to the public take into account all aspects of
>> accessibility for Persons With Disabilities;
>>
>>
>>
>> (c) Provide training for stakeholders on accessibility issues facing
>> Persons
>> With Disabilities;
>>
>>
>>
>> (d) Provide in buildings and other facilities open to the public signage
>> in
>> Braille and in easy to read and understand forms;
>>
>>
>>
>> (e) Provide forms of live assistance and intermediaries, including guides,
>> readers and professional sign language interpreters, to facilitate
>> accessibility to buildings and other facilities open to the public;
>>
>>
>>
>> (f) Promote other appropriate forms of assistance and support to Persons
>> With Disabilities to ensure their access to information;
>>
>>
>>
>> (g) Promote access for Persons With Disabilities to new information and
>> communication technologies and systems, including the Internet;
>>
>>
>>
>> (h) Promote the design, development, production and distribution of
>> accessible information and communications technologies and systems at an
>> early stage, so that these technologies and systems become accessible at
>> minimum cost.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Sonu
>>
>>
>>
>> National Facilitator-Young Voices
>>
>> Web: www.lcdisability.org/youngvoices
>>
>>
>> Search for old postings at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a message to
>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>
>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>> please visit the list home page at
>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>
>
>
> Search for old postings at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/
>
> To unsubscribe send a message to
> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
> with the subject unsubscribe.
>
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please
> visit the list home page at
> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>


-- 
Akhilesh Kumar Dahiya,
Advocate.
Mobile: +91 9210616426
New Delhi


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/

To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to