good work sir. pplease keep continue. I think we all should try best in our
capacity.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Manish Sharma" <manish11...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 6:37 PM
To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues
concerningthe disabled." <accessindia@accessindia.org.in>
Subject: [AI] delhi university, new roster, appointments, and ph
Hello list members, I, Manish Sharma, have100 % visually impaired, have
been teaching in the department of history, swami Shraddhanand College
since 17 July, 2006. Today, I want to bring the problems in 200 point
Roster and appointment process in relation to my college in particular and
university in general in your notice, which are as follows:
Delhi University, colleges are going to appoint large number of ad hoc
teachers according to 200 point roster which was implemented in 2007. The
Process of permanent appointments is supposed to commence soon under the
new roster. On 3000 -- 4000 vacant posts, appointments are proposed to be
done which is roughly equivalent to 40 % of entire teaching posts. In
order to implement 200 point roster, colleges haveput 100 point roster,
particularly for appointment of PWD, in cold storage.
PH candidates are being not appointed on ad hoc seats. University approved
200 point roster of different colleges does not mention PH'S appointments.
Allow me to give live example of my college i.e. Swami Shraddhanand
college. According to 200 point roster, Appointment process on ad hoc
seats in college has been begun from mid-December onwards. College is
conceding that total teaching strength in Shraddhanand College is more
than 168 teachers. Anybody can view the roster of Shraddhanand College on
its website.
Of 168 appointed teachers (both permanent and ad hoc), 6 disable were to
be appointed. Shraddhanand College has appointed only 4 disable teachers
thus far. When I brought this fact in principal's knowledge , he and
administrative officer, who has made college's roster also, told me that
PH will be appointed on 201^st post.[my protest is attached
If you people remember that in the movement of disability rights in Delhi
University, struggle for implementing 100 point roster had been important
for the rights of disabled. As a result of this movement, Delhi university
colleges appointed large number of disable teachers. Regrettably,
appointed PH teachers have become complacent and the focus of this
successful movement has diverted to other perks like house etc.
We must understand that for us to be able to successfully assert our
presence in the university it is mandatory that 3 reservations in teaching
and non-teaching posts are successfully filled.--------Regards, Manish
Sharma.
To
The Principal,
Swami Shraddhanand College,
(University of Delhi)
Alipur, Delhi-110036.
Sir,
Please accept this as my formal note of dissent in capacity of teacher in
charge, department of History, Swami Shraddhanand College. The reason for
my note of dissent and refusal to participate in the appointment of one
ad-hoc post in the department of history since the process violates the
provision of disability act and Supreme Court orders on reservations are
detailed as under:
1)In spite of the fact that the college administration is aware that I am
a visually challenged person they did not provide me with letters, etc.
associated with the interview in format accessible to the blind viz.
Braille or computerised soft copy, the is in violation of provisions of
the disability act.
2)In matters pertaining to appointments it is legally mandated that the
roster is displayed in public domain. In spite of my protest letters
pointing out the lapse of the college authorities on this ground the
college finally displayed the roster on the college website only
yesterday, 23/12/2013, afternoon, i.e. after the interview for
appointments to teaching posts in various departments of the college had
already commenced.
3)The roster has incorrect information pertaining to the department of
history. It indicates that the department has four ad-hoc posts before the
current 200 point post based roster was made. This is incorrect. Our
department has only three legally appointed ad-hoc teachers. The fourth
was illegally accommodated by you since in the academic semester July
2013-Dec 2013, as per the master time table of the college we had workload
for only three ad-hoc teachers. Importantly, by attempting to
retrospectively legalise an illegal appointment made in the previous
semester you have rendered the 200 points roster prepared for the current
semester i.e. January 2014-June 2014 incorrect and illegal. If two posts
are shown to be appointed, as is legally required, the roster for
appointments to be made in the college will change.
4)In the limited time that was available for me to peruse the roster for
teaching posts, it is faulty on several counts. To begin with roster is
prepared in accordance to the date on which a post is created. This is
true both for posts that are created due to retirement of a teacher and
posts that are created due to expansion of teaching posts. In violation of
this rule the 200 point post based roster for the college has been
prepared by arranging departments in alphabetical order. Any appointment
made on this faulty roster will therefore be illegal.
5)The roster for appointments to teaching post in the college also
violates the supreme court orders that explicitly state that the total
number of seats reserved for affirmative action should not exceed 50% of
the posts advertised. The 200 points roster was applicable in 2007 when
reservation for OBC was implemented in teaching post. Any backlog in this
roster thus accrues from the year 2007, when the 200 points post based
roster is implemented. The roster provided by you however beging
calculating the backlog form 1970 thus inflating the number of seats in
backlog and thus effectively reserving more than 50% seats. This is
contempt of the highest court of the land.
6)Finally, the roster is completely silent on the quota for the disabled
candidates. As per the disability act at three more appointments need to
be made for persons with disability. It is incumbent on the college
authorities to earmark the posts reserved respectively for the visually
handicapped and orthopedically handicapped persons.
Sir, being a law abiding citizen of the country I cannot be party to a
process that violates the disability act and is in contempt of the Supreme
Court of India.
Thank you.
Your's truly.
Manish Sharma
Teacher-in-charge,
Department of History
CC:
Chief Justice, Supreme court of india
VC, University of Delhi
PROVC, University of Delhi
Dean of Colleges, University of Delhi
Time to meet up again!
Register for AccessIndia Convention 2014:
http://accessindia.org.in/harish/convention.htm
Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/
To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.
To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
please visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of
the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its
veracity;
2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails
sent through this mailing list..
Time to meet up again!
Register for AccessIndia Convention 2014:
http://accessindia.org.in/harish/convention.htm
Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/
To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.
To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent
through this mailing list..
