Dear Friends, Till very recently I was proud of the fact that accessindia is a group of educated blind people and have always thought that we will argue but never abuse. I am afraid I have been proved wrong this time. I cannot understand what will be achieved by abusing an individual or a group of individuals.
I think the issues are more important than any individual and we ought to concentrate on the issues. Now that the bill has been sent to the Standing Committee (unless we get the ordinance) we must discuss about lexities in the bill and work towards reducing or getting them out. Please stop people bashing. Let us argue on points and now that all of us are on the list, let us have a fruitful and healthy debate. With best wishes, Ketan On 2/24/14, Neelima Surve <neelima.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr. Abidi sir! > ! > > Pasting one original mail on ai list also, kindly answer for it. > > We all know you don't have any such answer for these questions. > > You cannot say anything for Avinash or some others. We all know how > they spent their countless nights without sleeping for not passing > this bill due to some fact. Not just because, to come their name in > media as like you. Sorry for this harsh comment, but, it is true. > > One question, to all of those, who don't think, people are arguing. I > am not against of dignity, but, when another person comes & put a > sarcastic remark to Mr. Rungtha. Like Rungtha (Advocate) does it make > sence? He should know that, Mr. Rungtha indulge in this battle since > 70, not like him just now. Or not to get prestige from another party. > > Dear Abidi sir, > > I agree with you that you have been a very strong disability activist. > But here are my questions: > 1. why did you lead a campaign in favour of passing this bill without > any debate among stakeholders and even without looking at the content > of the bill? > 2. it is very true that it was only NFB which could get access to the > copy of this flawed bill. Had nfb not circulated the draft in public > domain, the passing of this bill would have done an immense damage to > the very interests of the disableds. > 3. why did you not try to seek a copy of the bill from the government? > 4. why did you not tell the disableds that you have not looked at the > approved cabinet draft? > > -- > PRANJAL > M.Phil research scholar > Centre for West Asian Studies > School of International Studies > Jawaharlal Nehru University > New Delhi: 110067 > > > -- > God examine those whom loves he the most. > > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > -- Ketan Kothari Phone: [r] 24223281, Cell: 9987550614 MSN ID: muktake...@hotmail.com Skype ID: Ketan3333 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
