The writer is a former federal secretary.
http://www.dawn.com/news/1170433
THE census forms the basis of all activities of the government, from
economic management to infrastructural and institutional development,
provision of basic human rights such as security, health, education
and housing, social welfare, population planning, and resource
allocation.

The last census in Pakistan was held in 1998, after a gap of 16 years,
and now, after a gap of 16 more years, it has still not been conducted
although it is supposed to be on a decennial basis. This is just
another sign of the decay of national institutions which are of
critical significance in a civilised society but that have fallen on
evil days in Pakistan due to political and bureaucratic lethargy.

In India, the census has been conducted regularly every 10 years from
1901 onwards, and the 2011 census was the first time that information
was collected through the use of biometric technology. The 2011 census
is remarkable as it was conducted in 16 languages, with segregated
data on education, households, languages, religious affiliations, and
age-wise grouping of the youth. However, the census is drastically
short on disability data, which is as under-reported there as it is in
Pakistan.

In Pakistan, the figure of 3,286,630 disabled persons in a total
population of 132,352,000 was first arrived at through the 1998
census, indicating 2.4pc disabled in Pakistan. This figure was hotly
contested by civil society and NGOs working for the disabled, who
pointed out the shortcomings of the survey methodology which, among
other things, did not take into account the social barriers and stigma
related to the disabled in the country.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The first barrier that the disabled encounter is statistics.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to the same census, 7.6pc of the disabled were classified as
'mentally retarded'. This term does not differentiate between the
various intellectual disabilities such as autism, ADHD, ADD, dyslexia,
Down's, or other learning disabilities, with the result that teachers
and caregivers are not properly trained to deal with these problems,
closing the doors forever to the education and rehabilitation of those
with these disabilities.

However, the 2.4pc figure continues to have an impact on the
allocation of resources for the disabled, as with miniscule funding
the government cannot properly plan and deliver services necessary for
treatment, intervention and rehabilitation, such as medical care,
developing special education materials and aids, training of teachers,
ensuring prosthetics, physiotherapy, psychotherapy, etc.

The UN Experts Group on Disability that met in July 2014 to look at
various issues in collection and measuring of data on disability found
that more than a billion people or 15pc of the world's population are
living with disabilities. Further, the report stated that "persons
with disabilities are disproportionately represented among the poorest
segments of society" and about 80pc of persons with disabilities
reside in developing countries.

The meeting also highlighted the fact that the realisation of the MDGs
for persons with disabilities had not been accomplished partly due to
poor data collection methodologies. Apart from failing to devise
war-footing intervention strategies in the health, education and
poverty alleviation sectors, the government in Pakistan also ignored
the ballpark figure of 15pc disabled in the country despite the UN
findings.

So, for example, in the 2014-15 provincial budgets, the total outlay
for special education is less than Rs1.5bn. Add to that another
Rs1.5bn which is allocated from the social welfare and Baitul Mal
grants. Even then the figure of about Rs3bn is abysmally low as at
15pc of the population, the disabled are at least 30 million, given
the added factors of terrorist attacks, domestic violence and cousin
marriages in the country. At Rs3bn, the government is spending Rs100
per disabled person every year; minus the administrative costs, it is
spending Rs30 per disabled person.

So, the first barrier that persons with disabilities encounter is
statistics. If the government does not know the number of people who
need specific intervention, treatment, training and rehabilitation,
the budgetary allocations can never meet the needs. And sadly,
statistics can still be misleading because of attitudes in our social
set-up. There are huge uneducated, disenfranchised, poor communities
in Pakistan and other developing countries where the parents refuse to
bring out their disabled child or children from being seen and
counted.

The social contract between citizens and the state makes it imperative
for the state/government to develop credible systems of data
collection of the disabled to gauge their needs and take steps to
rehabilitate them in society. Civil society and community-based
organisations must also come forward with new ideas and solutions. But
at the end of the day, a strong, buoyant and people-friendly local
government is most effective, as demonstrated by the developed
countries. It is on this level that data collection is the easiest,
and this is an area that has been totally neglected in Pakistan by our
politicians.


-- 
Avinash Shahi
Doctoral student at Centre for Law and Governance JNU



Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/

To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to