+1 With a nod to git-svn for coolness.
- Jesse Yates Sent from my iPhone. On Sep 16, 2011, at 6:43 PM, Adam Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote: > With a little more research, it looks like the git mirror gives us the best > of both worlds anyway. Therefore, I declare this question moot. > > Cheers, > Adam > On Sep 16, 2011 8:49 PM, "Benson Margulies" <[email protected]> wrote: >> The project must use Apache svn as the definitive repository if you >> want to be at Apache. You get a git mirror, and some day there's a >> plot to allow full git, but some day is not today. >> >> Github as a primary reference is right out. >> >> Many of us make good use of git-svn at this point, infrastructure >> provides git repos to clone that are already tuned for that. >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Jesse Yates <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> Personally, I like to use git for my development. >>> >>> I know that other projects in apache commit to a main svn, but have a > branch >>> git that people can pull from. See >>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToContribute where they mention > that >>> they have an apache git that mirrors the svn. >>> >>> -Jesse Yates >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Adam Fuchs <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> >>>> I've heard a lot of people express a preference for git over svn. What > do >>>> people think about the prospect of using git (presumably on github) > rather >>>> than Apache's svn servers for Accumulo? Would this be compatible with > the >>>> other Apache infrastructure we would like to use (jira, confluence, > etc.)? >>>> Has any other Apache project gone this route? >>>> >>>> Adam >>>> >>>
