On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Aaron Cordova <[email protected]> wrote:
> I propose Accumulo drops all but one arbitrarily
>
Ok, the default configuration currently does this.   Like I said in
another comment Eric suggested sorting on the value in this case so
that its not arbitrary, and scans behave deterministically.

In the case where the user starts modifying the iterator stack, I
suppose you want an iterator that users can not see or override/remove
that does this?  That is not something I would advocate for?

Keith

Reply via email to