[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13225481#comment-13225481
]
Billie Rinaldi commented on ACCUMULO-452:
-----------------------------------------
I agree entirely that it would be better if timestamps were used solely for
versioning. However, because the API allows users to set timestamps manually,
they often do; and they expect them to be used like timestamps. If only this
part of the key had been named "version" instead.
> Generalize locality groups
> --------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-452
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-452
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Keith Turner
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
> Attachments: PartitionerDesign.txt
>
>
> Locality groups are a neat feature, but there is no reason to limit
> partitioning to column families. Data could be partitioned based on any
> criteria. For example if a user is interested in querying recent data and
> ageing off old data partitioning locality groups based in timestamp would be
> useful. This could be accomplished by letting users specify a partitioner
> plugin that is used at compaction and scan time. Scans would need an ability
> to pass options to the partitioner.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
