Replace OBR implementation with Felix OBR
-----------------------------------------
Key: ACE-97
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-97
Project: Ace
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.8.0, 1.0.0
Reporter: Steve Siebert
Priority: Minor
I have a need to have n OBRs available to the ACE provider, one of which will
be one or more Apache Archiva repositories. In a previous thread, we discussed
that the current ACE implementation of the OBR services are tied to its
implementation, so at a minimum the API would need to be split from its
implementation (purpose on that thread was a look at reusing the service API to
write a new store implementation for Archiva). However, what is the general
feeling about looking at using the Felix OBR subproject to expose an "OBR
federation" to ACE? Basically with this approach, we would gain some
functionality in ACE and remove the need to maintain the local implementation.
Also, given Felix's historical ties to RFC 112, ACE would be in a better
position to "convert" to the OBR specification once it is ratified by the OSGi
group.
Thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
