Hi,

Marcel Offermans  wrote
> 
> My suggestion for implementing a roadmap would be to define versions in Jira 
> and start assigning issues to them. That way we can use the "roadmap" feature 
> of Jira to track progress:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
> 
> So our first release would be 0.8.0 (for example), and we can start assigning 
> issues to it.
> 
+1

> 
> In general I feel we should try to cut our first release relatively soon, and 
> try to get into a rhythm. Therefore in general I think we should look at 
> what's fairly stable now and start with that.
> 
> Another question I have is what we should release. ACE is very modular, and 
> can be assembled and configured in different ways. On the other hand, a lot 
> of bundles are related. In short I don't think it makes a lot of sense 
> releasing bundles one by one. I would be in favor of a single release of all 
> (stable) bundles.
> 
> Also, I would like to take the first release as an opportunity to properly 
> baseline all bundle and package versions, use a version policy that conforms 
> to the one the OSGi Alliance recommends and only bump versions when things 
> actually change. That means that our next release will probably contain 
> bundles and packages that will not all be the same. This is very similar to 
> the OSGi specification itself, that is released as for example 4.2 but 
> contains packages with versions like 1.3, 1.2, 2.1, etc.
> 
Makes totally sense - I think it's important that we make it easy to
install and run ACE, which gets us hopefully a lot of interested people
having a look, test driving it etc.

Carsten
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
[email protected]

Reply via email to