Hi, This working group has been in a state of indecision about this draft for quite some time and I would like to gain some clarity on the matter.
On the one hand, we have a draft that there seems to be unanimous agreement would be useful to the lighting people. On the other hand, we have some concern that the draft might be misapplied to environments where PSK/symmetric keys should not be employed. As Hannes wrote, security is not a black and white matter. We need to acknowledge that fact. This, to me, seems to boil down to an applicability statement. On the matter of status, it is not appropriate to release this as an experiment. People want to code, release that code and see their customers use that code. This is precisely what a proposed standard is for. I would like to see this draft adopted by the working group, an appropriate applicability statement added, and see it shipped. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
