Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format extension
is
> being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2 and
1.3
> section for clarity.I don't understand what you are referring to. What is the "port format extension" you are referring to, and where in section 2 do you think we are depending upon it? I'm thinking that you are jumping to a conclusion based upon some poorly written text on our part :-) But, since I think all the authors are ignorant of that extension, we must be misleading you unintentionally. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
