Will do... -----Original Message----- From: Ace <ace-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 8:50 AM To: ace@ietf.org Subject: [Ace] Idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
Hi! As part of the shepherd review, I ran idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05. The following nits were found. Could these please be fixed in a revised draft. --[ snip ]-- Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest one being 1 character in excess of 72. Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5226 (Obsoleted by RFC 8126) == Outdated reference: A later version (-17) exists of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-16 -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 7159 (Obsoleted by RFC 8259) Summary: 2 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 2 comments (--). --[ snip ]-- The line which exceeds 72 characters is in Section 3.4. Specifically: /protected header / h'A1010A' /{ \alg\ 1:10 \AES-CCM-16-64-128\}/, Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
