Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work everyone put into defining this mechanism. I have one very minor comment that the authors may wish to take into account. ยง3.3: > /alg/ 3 : /HMAC256//256/ 5, This use of "//" seems problematic, given RFC 8610's vague reservation of this sequence for some kind of "comment to end of line" designation: (There are currently no end-of-line comments. If we want to add them, "//" sounds like a reasonable delimiter given that we already use slashes for comments, but we could also go, for example, for "#".) Given the potential ambiguity introduced by RFC 8610, perhaps consider some other syntax here instead of "//". _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
