Re: [Ace] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-09: (with COMMENT)

[Mike Jones]

Thanks for your review, Éric.  The "iss" claim is now explained on first use at 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-10#section-3 
(paralleling the treatment of the first use of the "sub" claim).

                                Thanks again,
                                -- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:46 AM
To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possess...@ietf.org; ace-cha...@ietf.org; 
r...@cert.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on 
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-09: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email 
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory 
paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7Cac997d452a7b4e78a10408d75d3f6f7a%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637080399363452091&amp;sdata=jEXnivuGKVwaa0Yq%2FxDxF4PF4hQGRiU96rA%2Bv5jfAME%3D&amp;reserved=0
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7Cac997d452a7b4e78a10408d75d3f6f7a%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637080399363452091&amp;sdata=VeFFk%2BcqykLKnsynNFWQgS9ERD28gGD%2Ba7chtRh0CYo%3D&amp;reserved=0



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. The document is easy to read. I 
only one nit in section 3 and feel free to ignore all of it: While "sub" is 
explained as being the "subject", nothing is written about "iss" claim on the 
first time this term is used, it is only explained the 2nd time.

For my IESG colleagues, I second Mirja's comment about adding a IANA registry 
entry based on email.

Regards,

-éric


_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace