On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 06:16:34PM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On Dec 20, 2019, at 17:34, Klaus Hartke <har...@projectcool.de> wrote: > > > > I would prefer if draft-ietf-ace-coap-est didn't say anything here, > > since the Uri-Host and Uri-Port options and whether they should be > > omitted or not is entirely specified by CoAP [RFC7252].* > > Klaus has an important point here. > > We need to be **much more** vigilant about specifications messing with their > normative references. > Saying how they are used, yes, but re-stating (or, worse, re-interpreting) > normative material from those references is prone to creating dialects that > no longer interoperate with their unadulterated originals. Unless these are > hopelessly broken(*) and this is the only way to fix them, this is a MUST NOT.
Indeed; thank you Klaus and Carsten for reiterating it. -Ben _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
